|
Katarina Tanner
March 12, 2008
# of Words: 470
Ethanol Production
Existing federal laws that mandate ethanol in United States gasoline production have diverted trainloads of corn from
America’s food supply-chain to ethanol factories. A major new study formally
issued May 17 “conservatively estimates that increased corn prices driven by rapidly expanding United States
ethanol production have increased United States
retail food prices by fourteen billion annually.”
The study finds that increases in retail food prices could reach twenty
billion annually when crude oil prices array from $65 to $70 per barrel and corn prices reach $4.42 per bushel, weighed against
the $2 per bushel that existed in 2006. Under this scenario the study shows that,
consuming more than half of United States
corn, wheat and other grain production, United States
ethanol production could reach thirty billion gallons by 2016. So, United States
planted corn acreage would increase by 44 percent, from 78 million acres in 2006 to 112.5 million acres. This is a classic example of the law of supply. As the law
of supply states, holding everything else constant, increases in price cause increases in the quantity supplied, and decreases
in price cause decreases in the quantity supplied. In this case, the price of
corn has increased causing a substantial increase in the quantity of corn supplied.
While the costs of corn are increasing, the production costs of corn
products as well as meat and dairy products are increasing. As fuel companies
buy more and more corn, prices will rise for cereals, corn bread, popcorn, corn syrup, corn tortillas, cooking oils, and many
other goods that use corn as an input in the production process. The change in
the price of inputs is the factor that is most likely to cause the supply curve for a product to shift. So, because the price of corn, which is a component of many goods, has increased, the production costs
of these goods increases and these goods will be less profitable at every price.
Uncle Sam gives ethanol manufacturers a 51-cent-per-gallon subsidy,
so therefore there is a 54-cent-per-gallon tariff implicated with ethanol imports. This
is one explanation for another unintended consequence that affects for the most part everyone’s pockets. Gasoline prices shot up last summer since ethanol, largely produced in the Midwest,
had to be shipped south and to both coasts to be blended, by law, with gasoline.
The demand for ethanol has affected many goods in the market. Its amazing how one element can impose an adjustment upon numerous other elements
in the market? Many goods have experienced, or soon will, a production cost increase
as a result of increasing corn prices determined by the quickly expanding ethanol production in the United States. However there could
be more consequences to result from this, this study did not consider numerous impacts such as demands for higher wages, the
impact on environmentally sensitive land, the availability of grain-based humanitarian food aid, and the availability and
cost of healthier oils.
Text 3_4
March 26, 2008
# Of Words: 432
Ethanol Production
Existing federal laws that mandate ethanol in United States gasoline production have diverted trainloads of corn from America’s food supply-chain to ethanol factories. A major new study formally issued May 17 “conservatively estimates that increased
corn prices driven by rapidly expanding United States ethanol
production have increased United States retail food
prices by fourteen billion annually.”
Increases in retail food prices could reach twenty billion annually when crude
oil prices array from $65 to $70 per barrel and corn prices reach $4.42 per bushel, weighed against the $2 per bushel that
existed in 2006. Under this scenario the study shows that, consuming more than
half of United States corn, wheat and other grain
production, United States ethanol production could reach
thirty billion gallons by 2016. So, United States planted corn acreage would
increase by 44 percent, from 78 million acres in 2006 to 112.5 million acres. As
the law of supply states, holding everything else constant, increases in price cause increases in the quantity supplied, and
decreases in price cause decreases in the quantity supplied. In this case, the
price of corn has increased causing a substantial increase in the quantity of corn supplied.
While the costs of corn are increasing, the production costs of corn products
as well as meat and dairy products are increasing. As fuel companies buy more
and more corn, prices will rise for cereals, corn bread, popcorn, corn syrup, corn tortillas, cooking oils, and many other
goods that use corn as an input in the production process. The change in the
price of inputs is the factor that is most likely to cause the supply curve for a product to shift. So, because the price of corn, which is a component of many goods, has increased, the production costs
of these goods increases and these goods will be less profitable at every price.
Uncle Sam gives ethanol manufacturers a 51-cent-per-gallon subsidy, so therefore
there is a 54-cent-per-gallon tariff implicated with ethanol imports. This is
one explanation for another unintended consequence that affects for the most part everyone’s pockets.
Its amazing how one element can impose an adjustment upon numerous other elements
in the market? Many goods have experienced, or soon will, a production cost increase
as a result of increasing corn prices determined by the quickly expanding ethanol production in the United States . However there could be more consequences to result from this, this study did not consider
numerous impacts such as demands for higher wages, the impact on environmentally sensitive land, the availability of grain-based
humanitarian food aid, and the availability and cost of healthier oils.
|